HttpArena
Comparisons

Koru web framework comparison: any two, head to head

orisha-uring is quicker than orisha on 7 of the 8 profiles they both run, and behind on 1. On the HTTP/1.1 composite they score 4595 and 1523.

Pick any two of the 2 Koru entries. Requests per second is the best of three runs and the delta is the first column against the second; every row is the same profile at the same connection count, on the same machine. What each profile measures.

ProfileConnsorisha-uring req/secorisha req/secDeltaorisha-uring p99orisha p99
Baseline4,0964,114,610501,761+720%1.39ms12.30ms
Pipelined4,09640,513,0327,953,337+409%2.26ms12.40ms
Short-lived4,0962,665,265361,621+637%3.05ms23.40ms
Latency-10K1,0249,9799,982-0%103.0us88.0us
Latency-1M1,024998,091499,192+100%163.0us9883648.0us
JSON Comp4,0961,621,485417,915+288%5.48ms19.50ms
JSON Comp16,3841,564,485380,531+311%17.70ms64.30ms
JSON TLS4,0961,482,980440,016+237%86.28ms36.26ms

Common comparisons

orisha-uring vs orisha

Questions

Is orisha-uring faster than orisha?

orisha-uring is quicker than orisha on 7 of the 8 profiles they both run, and behind on 1. On the HTTP/1.1 composite they score 4595 and 1523. Both run on the same machine, in the same round, against the same profiles.

Which Koru framework is fastest overall?

orisha-uring holds the highest HTTP/1.1 composite of the Koru entries, at 4595. The composite is throughput over the whole suite; if a service is one shape of workload, compare that profile on its own in the table above, because the order changes.

Every Koru entry

Results updated · Koru composite ranking · Compare across languages · Other languages · Open the leaderboard